Thursday, 16 May 2013

Five links for commenting


First comment

http://visualdesensitization.blogspot.co.nz/2013/04/is-use-of-visual-media-desensitizing-in.html#comment-form




Second comment

http://icantrememberwhatthisbitwasmeanttobe.blogspot.co.nz/2013/04/manga-as-form-of-literacy.html#comment-form





Third comment

http://brief2-socio-political.blogspot.co.nz/2013/05/capital-punishment-need-or-not.html




Fourth comment

http://abrown83.blogspot.co.nz





Fifth(last) comment

http://thisismyblog098.blogspot.co.nz


Monday, 6 May 2013

Arguments

Argument 1
 
 


Some have strong belief that art should be only allowed to draw on canvas. They believe that it is totally unacceptable to draw on someone else’s property without permission. In an article written by Arifa Kabar and Paul Vallely, one of the interviewees named Hardy states “the trouble is that it is has been sprayed all over other people's property without their consent and that is simply vandalism”. Truly, in my point of view, nine out of ten graffiti on public space look unpleasant and ugly, so a number of people called as “City decay”. They assume this is the main reason of ruining landscape and surroundings. I firmly believe that public transportations are not appropriate way to do graffiti as everyone uses them. Yet, the number of reported graffiti cases doesn’t seem to be reducing and it has been increasing sharply day by day.


 

 
 

 

 
On the other hand, what if Picasso draws on wall of building, I wonder whether it is concerned as art or vandalism. To me, there is no certain way of judging an art form; everyone has its own opinion on it. Moreover, it is an inevitable fact that some artists have more talents than some of the world’s greatest renowned artists such as Bansky  and Ben Eineand. A CNN article written by Jareen Iman, Swann outlined "Street art to me is a person showing his talent; many artists go undiscovered, they take chances when and where they do it". At Toronto, a building owner defended the wall which is covered with graffiti to remain while Graffiti Panel strongly disagreed with his opinion. On top of this, some clean-up members of the sorority changed their minds after seeing some small stenciled images of Buddha and Jimi Hendrix on light posts. They don’t think they should have to remove them because they are not offensive. 
 
 






 
 
Argument 2
 


 
Every city in the word has spent a lot of money on clean-up. These fees generally come from tax-payers and I certainly believe that they are not happy with the way of spending their money on it. Ironically, there are no national statistics kept about graffiti, but people can assume how much it normally costs by reading this blog and need lots of human resources in order to get rid of the graffiti.




 
 
There is no doubt that some graffiti are very eye-catching and amazing so they attract walkers from young to old. Such graffiti are drawn beyond people’s imaginations and they deliver creative thinking and express ideas to viewers within a short glance. In present, numerous people continuously visit Melbourne to see laneways covered with graffiti. Here is the list of street art in Melbourne recommended by BBC Travel. On top of this, an annual event called
"Graffiti Gone Global" held the first weekend of December in Miami, Florida. I was completely taken aback after seeing the displayed graffiti on the walls in this event and I realized that there are a lot of creative and genius graffiti artists exist than I expected.





 
 
 
Argument 3





 
 
I have no doubt that a large proportion of children have experienced drawing graffiti on walls at their young age even though their parents are not allowed them to do. According to Graffiti Control Program, adolescents are very vulnerable to get involved in graffiti vandalism for many reasons such as peer recognition, lack of artistic and recreational alternatives, the element of danger and lack of appropriate parental supervision and discipline. Therefore, once they are exposed to such environments, there are more possibilities to get wrong concept of graffiti. As a result, they ruining hundreds and thousands dollars on properties.
 

 
 
 

Fortunately, graffiti can be used for encouraging youth in positive ways. For instance, some cities have been running programs which painting abandoned buildings with graffiti artists and minors in order to turn them into beautiful and attractive buildings. The purpose of providing it is not only for beautifying landscape but also gives proper education of art. For instance, The mural program at Access Gallery provides  kids to generate creative energies and help develop the community further working with graffiti artists who have disabilities. McLeese (as cited in Rodgers, 2012) reported "The opportunity to learn about graffiti might entice the youth to join the program, but once they are there, they are exposed to a wide variety of different opportunities".
 


 


In conclusion, graffiti is one of the biggest problems in a society and both sides of opinions are very reasonable. However, instead of thinking graffiti as city decay, we have to change our minds towards it and start to think about positive sides in order to make a harmony between society and graffiti artists.









  
Now, what do you think when you hear the word "graffiti"?
 
 
Did you change your mind ?
 






 




 
 

References


Anikka Maya Weerasinghe. (2010, July 20). “DAVID CAMERON ENDORSES CRIMINAL GRAFFITI VANDAL?” A CONVERSATION WITH BEN ELNE. Retrieved from http://artthreat.net/2010/07/ben-eine/
 

Banksy couldn’t beat this: The graffiti artists paining homes in Gambia. (2013, March 25). METRO. Retrieved from http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/25/banksy-couldnt-beat-this-the-graffiti-artists-painting-homes-in-gambia-3559114/


Ben Groundwater. (2013, August 4). Bristol’s most famous son. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/uk-europe/8521932/Bristols-most-famous-son

 

CNN. (2012, August 5). From graffiti to galleries: Street vs. public art. Retrieved from  http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/03/living/ireport-street-art-public-art

 

Graffiti Control Program. (n.d). Retrieved from
http://www.sandiego.gov/graffiti/about/problem.shtml


Graffiti: Street art – or crime? The INDEPENDENT. (2008, July 16). Retrieved from 

 
Humber. (2012, November 7). Graffiti: is it art or vandalism? THE ART NEWSPAPER.  
  Retrieved from http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Graffiti-is-it-art-or-vandalism/28040


Kids invited to help graffiti project. (2011, Ocotober 19). The LINCOLNITE. Retrieved from http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2011/10/kids-invited-to-help-graffiti-project/


Nehal Patel. (n.d.). Graffiti in Austin: Crime or Art?

 
Patrick Rodgers. (2012, April 2). Getting Up: Improving Youth Outcomes with Graffiti in Denver. Retrieved from http://jjie.org/getting-up-improving-youth-outcomes-graffiti-denver/78331/


Rhode Island cracks down on graffiti. 12WRPI.com EYE witness News. (2013, April 9). Retrieved from  http://www.wpri.com/dpp/news/local_news/providence/Rhode-Island-cracks-down-on-graffiti

Steven Martinez. (2012, October 29). Graffiti Gone Global.  Retrieved from http://loweredlifestyle.com/graffiti-gone-global/

 
The artful dodgers of Melbourne’s graffiti revolution. (2012, January 27). BBC. Retrieved from http://owll.massey.ac.nz/referencing/referencing-other-material-in-apa.php


Teenagers caused over €32,000 of damage with graffiti court hears. (2013, March 20). THE IRISH TIMES. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/teenagers-caused-over-32-000-of-damage-with-graffiti-court-hears-1.1332529

 
Tcboss. (2009, January 28). Graffiti is art, not vandalism. Retrieved from http://tcboss.hubpages.com/hub/Graffiti-is-art